None Of the above
City
Pulse
Lawrence Cosentino
Local atheists tell their stories
Every
soul in Christendom knows that sometimes, a supper is more
than just a supper. “We are apostles,” Jim
Hong, president of the Mid-Michigan Atheists and Humanists,
exhorts at a Sunday, Dec. 3, meeting in East Lansing.
“We need to go out and expand. We need to
network.”
In
recent months, biologist Richard Dawkins and several other
high-profile philosophers and scientists fed up with
religious fundamentalism have urged atheists to come out of
the closet. Judging by the current membership boom in
Hong’s group, a lot of local atheists are doing just
that.
In
less than two years, Hong, a structural engineering
consultant who lives in Jackson, has seen attendance at
monthly meetings spike from a single-digit trickle to an
average of 20 and a high of 35, with 60 people on the
group’s register. Most members are from the Lansing
area, but others come from as far away as Lake Orion,
Monroe and Flint.
This
afternoon, Hong has invited a manageable fraction of the
group to share thoughts and stories about coming out as
atheists in a country overwhelmingly populated by the
faithful. They’re also here to plan a Dec. 17 winter
solstice celebration, an alternative to the religious
festivals that dominate December. On the secular docket
thus far is a silent auction and a talent show featuring
songs, poems, dance and Hong’s dazzling demonstration
on how to fold a shirt in 2.1 seconds.
Amid
the laughs and short-term business, the word
“apostle” rings a 2,000-year-old bell. As Hong
suggests ways to go forth and spread the word about
atheism, it’s hard not to notice that there are 12
other people at the table, sharing ideas while picking at
lo mein remnants, fortune cookies and soft serve ice cream.
Could
this be the start of something big?
Lights out,
lightbulb on
Don’t expect an atheist
millennium to descend upon the Earth anytime soon. Despite
the accidental Last Supper head count, these potential
apostles are not even the on the same page, let alone
chapter and verse.
“Preach and it
doesn’t work,” Therese Hercher, one of the
group’s newer faces, says to Hong. “Put me in a
corner, and I’m going to come out swinging.
It’s better to be a role model.”
Some
wear the group’s name proudly, but Hercher and others
aren’t even sure they like the term
“atheist.”
“Atheism
is about what we aren’t,” Hercher says.
“But there’s something we all are, too.
We’re reasonable people. We rely on reason and not
mysticism or superstition.”
“I
don’t reveal much about being an atheist because of
the conceptions some people have about us,” ventures
Regina Fry, an almost painfully soft-spoken artist from
Lansing. “I would rather that people see that I hold
certain values about caring for each other and the earth
and promoting justice.”
Tom
McFarland, an enthusiastic member of the group who also
drives to East Lansing from Jackson, is clearly more
comfortable with the word “atheist” than Fry or
Hercher. “We’re passionate about being
atheists,” he says. “It’s not just,
‘I’m an atheist, get over it.’
There’s a lot of thinking, a lot of process
involved.”
That,
Hong says, is just why he wants the group to reach out.
“Once people get a sense of who non-believers are,
they might be more accepting,” he explains.
“We’re moral people. We don’t have
horns.”
While
some people at this table have been atheists for decades,
Hong speaks with the zeal of the recent convert. He says
the turning point came when his brother-in-law told him the
blackout that struck the northeast United States in August
2003 was a trial sent to Earth by God.
“That
really got to me,” Hong says. “It didn’t
make any sense at all. I got to thinking about how natural
disasters, and how so many people in the world are hungry.
Why am I so lucky? To say it was part of a plan
didn’t make sense to me.”
Since
then, the openly religious stance of the Bush
administration, not to mention that of its terrorist foes,
has provoked a slew of aggressively atheist literature [see
box, “Unbibles for unbelievers”] and pushed
Hong and others toward open avowal of atheism.
Against this
backdrop of baroque-era-Bush backlash, Hong joined Steve
Kwart of Lansing in May 2005 to overhaul a sputtering
predecessor group of local atheists. In Kwart’s
words, the original group was patterned on a business
model, met in libraries and “wasn’t very much
fun.”
When
Hong and Kwart eliminated dues and by-laws, added humanists
to the tent, and moved the monthly venue to a popular East
Lansing restaurant, attendance went up.
Some
members, like Ray Ziarno of Lansing, a retired state
employee, value the group as a chance to network with
like-minded people. “This is something that one could
not experience, at least in the Lansing area, until
recently,” he says.
But
Hong has longer-range plans. He urges outreach with
“measurable results,” suggesting the group
distribute pamphlets, draft talking points, arrange
lectures, even set up an atheist support hotline.
“Otherwise, we’re just talking to each
other,” he says.
Don’t
ask, don’t tell
For
some atheists, “just talking to each other” is
comfort enough. Several recent polls put the number of
self-described atheists in the United States somewhere
between 1 and 3 percent, leaving few kindred spirits in the
average atheist’s life.
Rose,
an out-of-town journalist who has just moved to Lansing,
requested her last name be withheld because she
doesn’t want to jeopardize her employment prospects.
“I’ve become ever less comfortable about
discussing faith or religion with people I’ve just
met or don’t know well,” she says.
This
time of year, there are holidays to deal with, but most of
the atheists at this table say they simply avoid the
subject of religion at home.
“We
have a don’t-ask, don’t-tell policy at our
house,” smiles Kwart, a bearded, mild-mannered
investor in his 30s. “When we gather for the holidays
we simply don’t discuss subjects that we know will
only start an argument. We focus on what we do have in
common. It makes life a lot easier.”
Kwart
goes to his family’s religious ceremonies, and even
served as his nephew’s godfather.
Ziarno,
who is about 20 years older than Kwart, does the same. He
goes to the religious weddings of friends and family,
although he adds sadly that they are now outnumbered by
funerals. “I generally participate out of
politeness,” he says.
“I
don’t hide my non-belief from anyone but my
family,” explains Russ Rogers, a regular at the East
Lansing meetings. Rogers says the subject of religion
simply doesn’t come up in his family. “If any
of them asked, I would honestly state my position.”
In
recent years, the Internet has helped atheists reach beyond
unsympathetic work and home environments to connect with
others who feel the same way they do. Nevertheless,
becoming an atheist is, overwhelmingly, a solitary journey
that starts early in life and takes years, sometimes
decades, to complete.
“I
did well in school, had a lot of friends, but felt somewhat
like an isolated island when it came to questioning
religion,” Kwart, a former Catholic altar boy, says.
The
sequence and timing may vary, but many atheists go through
phases strikingly similar to the coming-out process
described by gays and lesbians. Again and again, atheists
talk of vague confusion, inner struggle, solitary resolve,
one or more last-ditch attempts to put the godless
toothpaste back in the tube, and a final, public break with
the past.
Mike
Foland, a soft-spoken retired Ford employee who has lived
in Lansing all his life, can make the coming-out comparison
with authority. He came out as both gay and atheist at the
same time.
Foland
found himself against the wall in 2003, when his parents
e-mailed him, criticizing a female friend who was planning
a commitment ceremony with a female partner.
“My
parents told me how it was against God,” Foland says.
It
wasn’t easy for Foland to answer that e-mail
honestly. “I basically grew up in the church,”
he says.
Foland
struggled with his own sexuality since he was 13, and
didn’t resolve it for himself until 1992. “I
questioned my orientation before that, trying to work
through Biblical verses that talked about
homosexuality.”
When
his parents sent him the 2003 e-mail, he steeled himself
and wrote back: “What you’re writing about her,
you’re writing about me, and that’s one reason
I don’t believe anymore.”
“I
had not come out to my parents until that writing,”
he says. “So all in one e-mail, I came out to my
parents as a gay man and an atheist.
“I
think they were more upset about me being an
atheist.”
Participation,
not faith
Regina
Fry loved going to church as a child. “There
wasn’t anything about it I hated, or turned away
from,” she says.” I found the sermons
inspiring, but I never felt that I believed in God.”
She
considered herself an agnostic for a few years, a phase
described by several others at the table, but ultimately
concluded she was an atheist — albeit a non-dogmatic
one. “I don’t know if I can say I’m sure
there’s no God, but I’m sure I don’t
believe there’s a God,” she says.
Opposite
the mild-mannered Fry sits Carolyn Dulai of Lansing, a
former Green Party candidate for state senator who zeroes
in on the sexual politics of religion with ferocious
sarcasm.
“The
Christians worship three males: Father, Son, and Holy
Ghost,” she says, using the nasal drone of a standup
comedian. “Where’s the vagina? Even at the
Hindu temple, five miles from me in Haslett, they had a big
ceremony installing the penis. No vagina in sight.”
With
a sheaf of materials under his arm and quietly bookish air,
Rogers looks like he could be the group’s
theoretician.
“My
metaphor is geological erosion,” Rogers says.
“I was given a mountain and gradually watched it wear
away as I became more factually aware of the
universe.”
Like
most atheists, Rogers grew up in a religious tradition
(Lutheran, in his case), but describes his role as
“participation, not faith.”
“Even
a child, I could see that religion wasn’t solving
people’s problems for them,” he says. “In
my teens, I began to realize there is a wonderful natural
world out there that doesn’t require a theistic
interpretation.”
“It
wasn’t rebellion,” he insists. “I simply
investigated the matter, discovered it to be wanting
terribly, and elect to live my life that way.”
Rogers’
opposite number is Aaron Stuttman, a Lansing masseur and
Green Party member who ran unsuccessfully for governor this
year. Where Rogers looks as if he’s been reading
intently under a fluorescent lights for decades, Stuttman
leans backward insouciantly, with a California tan and new
age language to match.
“I
think I was allergic to church,” he says. “The
few times I went, it was boring and disturbing. The energy
was bad. The best metaphor I can think of is that is made
me feel sick, it wasn’t healthy.”
No pitchforks
Rogers’ erosion metaphor
struck a common chord with many atheists at the table. When
Ziarno left home to attend college at Michigan Tech in the
Upper Peninsula, he met and lived with people “of
other religions, and those with no religion at all.”
“And,
they didn’t have horns and a tail, and didn’t
carry a pitchfork,” he says with a grin.
“Slowly but surely, I really gave up the formalities
of religion, and, eventually, all beliefs in religion and a
God as some sort of a being.”
Like
most people at the table, John Kelly, a retired state
worker who lives in Lansing, was raised Catholic. He grew
up in the Panama Canal Zone, where he came to admire the
Franciscan nuns who taught him. “They were
dynamic,” he recalls. “They did wonderful
things for people.”
While
in high school, Kelly fell in love with science.
“Science was exciting,” he says. “Science
made sense, whereas the dogma was just, ‘Take this on
faith.’”
A
period of denial followed. “I tried to become a
Catholic again, I really did, but I realized after a point
that it was to no avail,” he says. “I just
didn’t believe.”
“For
years, I’ve never really been out front about my
feelings. Here I have a chance to be among people who are
of like mind.”
Like
Kelly, Kwart went through a “one last try”
phase after falling in love with science in high school.
“For a time I thought my faith in God was just weak
and I needed to try harder believing,” he says.
“I decided to read the Holy Bible in its entirety
with an open mind.”
Instead
of giving Kwart a stronger faith in God, scripture study
had the opposite effect. “It became more obvious to
me that the whole thing was made up by uneducated,
superstitious people thousands of years ago,” he
says.
Ever
the conciliator, Kwart qualifies his statement. “I
don’t think they were bad people,” he says.
“They simply didn’t have the luxury of 500
years of accumulated science, as we have today.”
Floppy doubts
Despite different backgrounds
and personal stories, a common thread linked every story
told at the table that afternoon:
Nobody could
name a teacher, guru, mentor, friend or family member who
showed the way to atheism.
On the
contrary, most pulled against strong family and cultural
currents, plagued by awkward, floppy doubts they
couldn’t tuck back into their brains.
Here, they
can wear those thoughts proudly untucked, but many still
worry about public perception.
“The
word atheist carries a lot of shock value,” Rose
says. “Not only is it highly provocative and widely
misunderstood, it doesn’t begin to express the values
I do cherish and live by.”
“We
don’t have morals — that’s the typical
belief people have,” Hong says.
In
response, Rose ticks off more than a dozen cherished
principles she’s not averse to calling
“beliefs.”
“I
believe in the power of reason, the
non-aggression-principle, freedom and free will, and a
moral code by which to live,” she says. “I
believe every individual is important, and that every
individual can and should make a positive difference in
this world.”
Hong
puts it more succinctly. “We believe in helping our
fellow man,” he says.
“We
just don’t pray for them."
The DaVinci Code Debate
The “DaVinci Code” debate has been
interesting yet somewhat shallow. While expressing
displeasure at the doubt cast upon their savior the
Christian community fell into promoting Dan Browns’
premise. Although more and more people are skeptical
of religion I suspect the clergy are more dismayed a
heretic is raking in more financial gain than they
are. The church should have critically welcomed Mr.
Brown because he at least promotes the myth Jesus Christ
was a character who shaped history. Many of us on the
other hand consider Jesus Christ a mythical character and
Christianity a guilt trip. To clarify the confusion,
go to the source.
Dan Brown only told it as it could have been just as he
read it in the Bible. Christians have a dilemma where in
Genesis 6:4 you read, “When the sons of God came in
unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them,
the same became mighty men which were of old, men of
renown.” Having read Genesis 6:4, is it so
outlandish to consider that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had
children? Obviously angels fornicated with mortal
women who had children that had offspring who are roaming
Earth today. Why is the church afraid of a connection
between everyday life and their mythical afterlife, do they
doubt the story themselves? Is it an immaculate
deception?
The Bible is intended to be a guidepost for morality yet
the morality of the present is the perverse version of a
twisted past. Humanity is shackled to that past
because berserk religious mythology has polluted common
sense today and humanity has such a brutal past and present
to be ashamed of. Why does society allow lunatics to
resort to war with god always on their side? I
suggest people step over into reality and stop blaming
non-existent demons for the state of planet Earth.
People need to read the pages and passages the clergy
ignores. All religious texts are flickering candles
in a hurricane of change.
Religion is divisive because it only brings people together
in sects. The majority of people haven‘t even
read the bible, yet everyone is positive everyone else is
wrong. If you question faith people get upset
although with a superficial knowledge they can only get
upset about what they were taught to get upset about.
Indignant indifference is confusion.
Mark Farris
Monroe,
Michigan